About this deal
I would like to continue to contribute to Wikipedia, and to get along with the current community. Can someone explain to me what part of my entries above are trolling? I need to know so I won't do it again. Please contribute if you have additional information. I plan on adding more in time. Zebruh 05:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC) Criminal group involves 1,500 underage Ukrainian girls in porn business with parents' knowledge". Pravda. 6 April 2005. Archived from the original on 18 October 2007.
Could an Admin add de:LA Studio an new Interwiki-Link? Thanks Kenwilliams 18:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC) You mean, de:LS Studio -- timecop 05:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC) Sure. Legasthenic... Kenwilliams 01:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC) I'll end with an opinion. I'm no legal expert on porn and stuff, but some scenes look like masturbation, and I bet those would be child porn in a lot of places. I haven't heard that the FBI has arrested anyone for owning a big LS collection, but news reports skip that sort of detail. 194.177.100.34 17:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC) What are you asking for here? Yes this article will be held to a higher standard than a lot of them are because of the subject matter, which is highly controversial. Controversial things are obviously going to get more scruitany. And no, you can't ask someone to verify something by looking at illrgal material, nor can first-hand observation of such material be a source. -- DanielCD 18:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
This entire article reads like it was compiled from chatter in the preteen girl newsgroups of a year ago. The ukrainian news sources cited are not themselves objective and may be considered propoganda of the ruling elite. Also shall we mention the actions of google? Was surprised to see this from a google search, I'd pressume it has got to be iok to include a link like that!! lol Anyway, just seemed odd to me that google would actually remove links from their results!! :o Perhaps it isn't too surprising, and should be expect. Just it seems like google could be going down the road they are already all the way down in china... How long until the china google is the worldwide google?
It is not true that no overt sexuality was seen in the videotapes. Many contain simulated masturbation, sexual kissing and simulated oral sex.Child pornography is an infamous crime today. By this I mean that it is a crime generally considered one of the most heinous; one that gets a lot of moral panic-style press articles; and one that nobody wants to be personally associated with. Other infamous crimes today include terrorism, and the manufacture and sale of methamphetamine. A Ukrainian child porn ring exposed". crime-research.org. Computer Crime Research Center. 29 July 2004. Archived from the original on 31 December 2005 . Retrieved 4 February 2006.
I've removed the label "child pornography" because it implies depictions of sexual acts, which are not present in LS content.
Came across this here, has a bunch of interesting info (although don't worry, no pictures there! lol). Might perhaps add this to the wiki article, such as the pay (10 to 40 dollars per hour, that sounds very very good to me if you are living in the former USSR!!) I removed this on the grounds there is no ref, and it has been questioned. I'm not saying it's wrong, but could someone find a ref and cite it before you replace it? I appreciate you're cooperation in understanding these things, right or wrong, still need refs. Thanks. -- DanielCD 03:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
